Optimizing Structural Analysis in Aircraft Design Software Professional (ADS)Structural analysis is a core stage in aircraft design: it verifies that a concept can survive loads, meet stiffness and weight targets, and satisfy certification requirements. Aircraft Design Software Professional (ADS) provides an integrated environment for modeling, analysis, optimization and documentation of aircraft structures. This article explains practical workflows, best practices, and tips to get the most accurate, efficient, and repeatable structural analysis results in ADS.
1. Define objectives and constraints before modeling
Start by clarifying what you need from the analysis:
- Primary goals: strength verification, buckling checks, fatigue life, modal behavior, or weight minimization.
- Certification constraints: load factors, ultimate and limit loads, safety factors.
- Manufacturing and operational limits: material selection, allowable thicknesses, joint types, inspection intervals.
Having precise objectives lets you choose the correct level of model fidelity, analysis types, and optimization targets in ADS, avoiding unnecessary complexity.
2. Choose the correct modeling fidelity
ADS supports models ranging from beam and shell idealizations to full 3D solid finite-element models. Matching fidelity to purpose saves time while preserving accuracy:
- Conceptual sizing and weight estimates: use beam and simplified panel models.
- Preliminary structural verification and load paths: shell models with appropriate stiffeners.
- Detailed local stress, notch, or fastener analysis: solid elements or submodeling of critical regions.
Use simplified models for system-level iterations and reserve high-fidelity FE for final verification or problematic areas.
3. Create a clean geometry and mesh strategy
Clean geometry and a rational meshing approach are fundamental:
- Start with CAD geometry that’s free of small features, gaps, or overlapping surfaces. Use ADS geometry cleanup tools to simplify fillets, tiny holes, and sliver surfaces.
- Use element types aligned with physical behavior: shells for thin panels, beams for spars/stringers, bricks for fittings and highly stressed local volumes.
- Follow mesh quality metrics: element aspect ratio, skew, Jacobian. In ADS, set mesh controls for size transitions and refinements near stress concentrations (cutouts, joints).
- Use structured meshing where possible for predictable results and easier convergence.
Mesh convergence studies are mandatory: run coarse → medium → fine meshes and compare critical responses (peak stress, displacement, eigenfrequencies). Stop when changes fall below your tolerance (commonly 2–5%).
4. Loadcases and load application best practices
Accurate load definition and application are as important as the mesh:
- Implement certification loadcases (maneuver, gust, landing, ground operations) and operational extremes. ADS allows grouping and superposition of loadcases—use this to track limit and ultimate condition responses.
- Apply aerodynamic loads as distributed pressure fields from CFD or panel methods, or use surrogate loads mapped to structural nodes. Make sure pressure-to-structure mapping preserves resultant forces and moments.
- For concentrated forces (engine mounts, landing gear), model load introduction with load spreads or stiffened pads rather than single-node point loads to avoid artificial stress peaks.
- Include inertial loads (fuel, equipment), thermal loads if relevant, and preloads from bolt torques or manufactured residual stresses when they influence performance.
5. Boundary conditions and support realism
Incorrect boundaries are a leading source of error:
- Model supports that reflect real constraints (joints, bearings, test fixtures). Rigidly clamping a model when the actual connection has flexibility will overestimate stiffness and shift load paths.
- Use connector elements (springs, dampers, hinges) to represent compliance. ADS provides joint elements; tune their stiffness based on tests or detailed submodels.
- For component tests simulated in ADS, replicate test fixture compliance explicitly to match test results and ensure correlation.
6. Selecting analysis types and solvers
Pick analysis types that match objectives and computational budget:
- Linear static: for primary strength checks under elastic behavior. Fast and suitable for initial sizing.
- Nonlinear static: required when large deformations, contact, material plasticity or geometric nonlinearity matter (e.g., post-buckling, panel collapse).
- Modal/ID: for natural frequencies and mode shapes; useful to avoid aeroelastic resonances.
- Buckling eigenvalue and nonlinear buckling: use eigenvalue buckling for initial buckling loads; follow with nonlinear buckling for post-buckling and imperfection sensitivity.
- Fatigue and damage tolerance: use cycle counting (e.g., rainflow) and local hot-spot stresses or crack-propagation analyses as required.
ADS integrates multiple solvers—use iterative or direct solvers based on problem size. For large, sparse systems, iterative solvers with preconditioning can be faster and less memory-intensive.
7. Use submodeling for localized detail
Submodeling lets you combine system-level accuracy with local detail where needed:
- Run a coarse global model to get boundary displacements and reaction forces.
- Create a high-fidelity local submodel (shell-to-solid transition, fine mesh, detailed fastener geometry) and apply boundary displacements from the global solution.
- This approach produces accurate local stresses without the computational cost of a full high-resolution global model.
8. Model joints, fasteners, and bonded interfaces realistically
Connections control load transfer and local stresses:
- Model rivets/bolts either as discrete fasteners (beam or connector elements) or using smeared stiffness for dense fastener fields.
- Include bearing, shear, and clearance behaviors where they influence strength and fatigue. Consider contact and preload in critical fasteners.
- For bonded joints, represent adhesive layers with appropriate stiffness or cohesive zone models when peeling or delamination is a concern.
9. Incorporate manufacturing effects and residual stresses
Manufacturing influences like cold-working, residual stress, and thickness variability affect strength and fatigue life:
- Add residual stress fields where known (e.g., from cold expansion around fastener holes or welding).
- Include tolerance-driven thickness and stiffness variations in sensitivity studies to ensure robustness to manufacturing scatter.
- For composite structures, model ply drops, overlaps, and cure-induced residual stresses if they significantly affect performance.
10. Verification, validation, and correlation with test data
ADS models must be validated against experiments and established theory:
- Start with simple benchmark problems (cantilever, plate with hole) and compare with analytic solutions to verify implementation.
- Correlate FE results with component-level tests: static load tests, modal tests, strain gage surveys. Adjust model parameters (boundary stiffness, material properties, joint representation) to improve correlation.
- Maintain a traceable record of assumptions, model versions, and correlation steps for certification evidence.
11. Automate workflows and use parametric studies
ADS supports scripting and parametric runs—use them to explore design space efficiently:
- Automate mesh convergence studies, loadcase sweeps, and sensitivity runs to save time and reduce human error.
- Use design-of-experiments (DOE) and surrogate models (response surfaces) for rapid trade studies between weight, strength, and cost.
- Couple ADS to optimization engines for topology, sizing, and ply-drop optimization while enforcing constraints (stress, buckling, manufacturability).
12. Fatigue and damage tolerance practices
Fatigue is often the life-limiting factor:
- Use local hot-spot stresses or notch-stress approaches for fatigue life prediction at joints and cutouts.
- Apply spectrum loading and cycle counting representative of operational usage. ADS can import flight-load histories and perform rainflow analysis.
- For damage tolerance, perform crack growth simulations and residual strength assessments under inspection intervals to meet certification requirements.
13. Reduce runtime without sacrificing quality
Speed up large analyses without losing reliability:
- Use symmetry and substructuring to reduce model size.
- Apply mass and stiffness condensation techniques where higher fidelity is not needed globally.
- Run linearized sensitivity analyses to screen variables before committing to nonlinear or high-fidelity runs.
- Use parallel processing and distributed solves available in ADS for large FE models.
14. Documentation, reporting, and traceability
Produce reproducible reports:
- Use ADS built-in reporting to capture loadcases, material data, mesh metrics, solver settings and critical results.
- Archive model versions, input decks, and post-processing scripts. Include correlation matrices and test comparison plots for certification artifacts.
15. Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
- Overly stiff boundary conditions — model joint compliance.
- Ignoring load introduction details — spread concentrated loads.
- Poor mesh control at stress concentrations — refine and perform convergence checks.
- Skipping validation — correlate with tests early.
- Neglecting manufacturing and residual stresses — include when relevant.
Conclusion
Optimizing structural analysis in ADS requires a disciplined approach: define objectives, pick the right fidelity, build clean geometry, apply realistic loads and boundaries, validate against tests, and automate where possible. Combining these practices lets you produce accurate, efficient, and certifiable structural analyses that guide better, lighter, safer aircraft designs.
Leave a Reply